Thoughts On Pareles On Web 2.0
John Pareles' "2006, Brought to You by You" in yesterday's New York Times, in which he talks about Web 2.0 portals and their glut of user-generated content, is sure to cause a stir. Pareles may have the business side wrong ("empty vessel" does not accurately describe the valuation of either company) but some of his comments ring true in the music arena.
Some thoughts on Pareles' article.
1. The claim to fame of user-generated websites has been sheer volume, not any meaningful enablement of commerce. YouTube views have rarely translated to a meaningful increase in music sales. It is for this reason that labels are wise to pursue revenue-sharing deals with YouTube. While radio and television have palpable effects on sales, YouTube has not yet exhibited a similar impact.
2. Message to labels: Keep trying new ideas, one of them may work. Warner Music Group won kudos for its forward-thinking strategy of creating branded channels at YouTube for two of its priority releases, Paris Hilton's self-titled debut and Diddy's Press Play. The problem is that YouTube obviously did not help either title. Hilton's album will be remembered as The Flop of 2006, and Diddy's Press Play had an extremely short stay in the Top 50 and is well on its way to flop status.
3. As with P2P, much of YouTube traffic is driven by other promotional efforts. For YouTube to best enable commerce, it needs to be synthesized with other marketing ingredients.
4. Pareles is one of the few journalists to highlight the need for filters and portals. While there has been an incredible increase in online content, there are still only 24 hours in a day. Time-starved people will require more efficient means to discover quality online content. Of long tail content, Pareles, wrote, "Face it: Song for song, most of them just aren’t as good." How very true. Existence does not guarantee a listenership.
Media critic/blogger Jeff Jarvis took Pareles' article to task. Others will surely bash Pareles for daring to diss Web 2.0. Jarvis wrote that Pareles is complaining about choice. But I think Pareles, who has made a career of highlighting music, worries about a lack of quality in all that quantity. (Think of a music critic getting 500 CDs in the mail every week when he used to get a more manageable 50 per week. ) The quality is there. Somewhere. Finding it is the problem.
The article is a comment to those who underestimate the work and skill involved in Web 2.0 success. Distribution is now like turning on a water faucet. How do artists use ubiquity to their advantage? The new system is "one that requires just as much hustle and ingenuity as the old distribution system," Pareles wrote. True. It's no coincidence that music's finest YouTube and MySpace success stories, OK Go and Lily Allen, are both signed to major labels. Even in Web 2.0, success takes a village.
Music Groups
