Seems there is a bug with the comments section, and former Coolfer contributor and music writer (and label owner) Alec Hanley Bemis wanted everybody to know he did not write the op-ed piece about Pitchfork. Since his comments are being rejected, and since it's a good way to continue to discourse/debate, I'll post what he wanted to say.
Hey, uh, just wanted to respond about that guy who accused me of writing this. I read Coolfer every day, but I only actually had posting privileges for a week, several months ago.
First off, regular contributors Nick Sylvester and Brandon Stosuy are friends of mine and I think they're both really strong writers. As is, for example, that William Bowers guy. Think that's his name.
Second, Pitchfork's actually been pretty nice to my label:
6.6
8.4
8.3
8.6
We avg an 8 or something. So, while I'd love to get hit with the best new music" stick, I'm not complaining one bit.
I do think this is an interesting debate though: yeah, Pitchfork's writing could be tighter...but that's not what the web is for; yes they get especially aggro on some record that don't quite deserve it ... but you could view that as a kind of art in and of itself (almost like exagerrating for comic effect); and finally, yes, they're super influential.
Anyone actually know what the traffic stats are? 125k uniques a day? Or 200k uniques per month? That'd be a huge difference and I'm sure some Pitchfork-er who knows is reading this.
-Alec
***
Label: http://www.brassland.org
Writing: http://www.brassland.org/AHB